Kruk v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Ste. Marie Railway Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.
August 17, 1925, plaintiff was injured while working on defendant’s railroad as a section hand. In suit for damages, his declaration contained two counts, both of which charged the elements of a cause of action for negligence and they were identical except that the first count contained an allegation, not in the second, that defendant was subject to the Michigan railroad liability law, 2 Comp. Laws 1915, §§ 5496, 5501; and the second count had additional allegations, not in the first, that it was defendant’s duty not to employ a person under 18 yearsoof age as a section hand-, that plaintiff…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. KinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Troxell v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Shippy v. Village of Au SableMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Sullivan v. Ross' EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- In re Broffee's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. HamacherMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
- Bathke v. City of Traverse CityMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
- Barnsdall Refining Corporation v. Birnamwood Oil Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1940
- Bowerman v. Detroit Free PressMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.