Legal Opinion

People v. Hamacher

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1989No. 81202, (Calendar No. 2)PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevin, J.

We granted leave to appeal in this case, consolidated on appeal with People v Vermeulen, 432 Mich 32; 438 NW2d 36 (1989), to consider the application of the spousal communication privilege set forth in § 2162 of the Revised Judicature Act.1 We conclude that the Court of Appeals correctly held that the privilege bars the *161testimony of the defendant’s wife in this case and affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals.

i

Section 2162 of the rja provides two distinct privileges. The first, the spousal privilege, is only applicable when the witness and the spouse are married at the time of trial. This…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Steinberg v. New York Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  3. McKinney v. Grand Street, Prospect Park & Flatbush RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  4. State v. MinceyArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Grattan v. . Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1883

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. People v. McGrawMichigan Supreme Court · 2009
  2. People v. WarrenMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  3. People v. TooheyMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
  4. People v. FisherMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  5. People v. VermeulenMichigan Supreme Court · 1989

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API