Shippy v. Village of Au Sable
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne. (Gartner, J.) Negligence case. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated' in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.
This case was before this Court in the January term of 1887, and a judgment in favor of the plaintiff reversed, and a new trial granted. Shippy v. Village of Au Sable, 65 Mich. 494. The case was then transferred from the Iosco to the Wayne circuit court. The declaration was amended in several respects, and the parties went to trial before Hon. George Gartner, with a jury, which trial resulted in a verdict for $10,500 for plaintiff.
When the case was here before, the chief neglect imputed to the defendant was the keeping and maintaining of a portion of the cross-walk, to wit, for about seven…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Westbrook v. Mobile & Ohio RailroadMississippi Supreme Court · 1889
- Battishill v. HumphreysMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Shadock v. Alpine Plank-road Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Town v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Williams v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Atlanta & Charlotte Air-Line Rwy. Co. v. GravittSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
- Elbert v. City of SaginawMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
- Love v. Detroit, Jackson & Chicago RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Bottoms v. Seaboard & Roanoke RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
- Cummings v. Conn. Gen. Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1930
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.