Legal Opinion
Dean v. Multiple Injury Trust Fund
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided December 24, 2002No. 97,260PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
KEITH RAPP, Judge:
11 The trial court petitioners, Jerry D. Dean and James H. Pilkington (Petitioners), appeal the decision of the Three-Judge Panel of the Workers' Compensation Court in favor of The Multiple Injury Trust Fund (MITF) deciding that a judgment against the MITF cannot be certified to District Court because of the ban imposed by 85 0.8. Supp.2002, § 42(A).1
BACKGROUND
2 Petitioners have unpaid awards against MITF and desire to certify the award to the District Court. The workers' compensation trial judge declined to certify based upon the exeeption in favor of MITF given…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Neil Acquisition, L.L.C. v. Wingrod Investment Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Samman v. Multiple Injury Trust FundSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Baptist Building Corp. v. BarnesCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994
- Stidham v. Special Indemnity FundSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dean v. Multiple Injury Trust FundSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- MULTIPLE INJURY TRUST FUND v. CELLINOSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
- Dean v. Multiple Injury Trust FundSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- Dean v. Multiple Injury Trust FundSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- MULTIPLE INJURY TRUST FUND v. CELLINOSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.