Legal Opinion

In Re Widening East Franklin Avenue

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 17, 1953No. 36,027, 36,028PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

240 Minn. 32 (1953)

IN RE WIDENING EAST FRANKLIN AVENUE.

ABRAHAM GERSHONE AND ANOTHER

v.

CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS.[1]

Nos. 36,027, 36,028.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

July 17, 1953.

Kelly, Levander & Gillen, for appellants.

John F. Bonner, City Attorney, and Palmer B. Rasmusson, Assistant City Attorney, for respondent.

KNUTSON, JUSTICE.

The facts necessary to a determination of the questions raised by this appeal briefly are as follows: On April 5, 1949, the city of Minneapolis passed a resolution providing for the commencement of condemnation proceedings under its city charter in connection with a grade…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State, by Peterson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  2. McRostie v. City of OwatonnaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  3. Barmel v. Minneapolis-Saint Paul Sanitary DistrictSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  4. In re Improvement of Lake of the Isles ParkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  5. Collins v. Village of RichfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Independent School District No. 273 v. GrossSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  2. Pettingill Theatre Co. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  3. Kick's Liquor Store, Inc. v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
  4. Binder v. Village of Golden ValleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  5. Minneapolis Board of Park Commissioners v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API