Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Draggin' Y Cattle Co. v. Junkermier, Clark, Campanella, Stevens, P.C.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 2019No. DA 17-0731Published

1Concurrence

Justice Dirk M. Sandefur, concurring.

¶41 I write separately to place this anomalous litigation in proper analytical context and to point out where I think the Court unnecessarily stopped short on the issue and record presented. As a preliminary matter, I concur with the Court's central holding that the amount of an insured's unilateral settlement of a third-party claim is not the presumed measure of damages for breach of the implied contract and related statutory duty to settle within policy limits, as is the case with a breach of the duty to defend. I thus concur in reversal of the District…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Comunale v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Universal Sales Corp. v. California Press Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Story v. City of BozemanMontana Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Staples v. FARMERS UNION MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANYMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Palmer v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeMontana Supreme Court · 1993

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API