Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club v. Narula
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HOLLENHORST, J.
[[]] * Plaintiff appeals from the judgment entered after the trial court sustained defendant’s demurrer to Plaintiff’s complaint without leave to amend. [[]]*
Procedural Background (E012417)
On April 16, 1992, Plaintiff initiated this action against Devendrá Singh Narula, personal representative of the estate of Manjit Singh, deceased (Defendant). 1 Following Defendant’s challenge to the initial pleadings, Plaintiff filed its amended complaint (the Complaint) on September 1, 1992. Plaintiff seeks damages on its rejected claim against the estate. Defendant demurred to the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. PopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Moore v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Hendy v. LosseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Wilner v. Sunset Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- City of Pomona v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Rodas v. SpiegelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Gulf Ins. Co. v. TIG Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 2001
- C.R. v. Tenet Healthcare Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2009
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.