Quay v. Duluth, South Shore & Atlantic Railway Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Mackinac; Shepherd, J. Case by Lafayette Quay, George W. Quay, and Edward S. Quay, copartners as D. Quay & Sons, against the Duluth, South Shore & Atlantic Railway Company for the negligent burning of certain logs. There was judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.
Plaintiffs instituted this suit to recover damages for the destruction by fire of about 300,000 feet of cedar logs alleged to have been caused by sparks from one of defendant’s locomotives. The logs were piled along defendant’s right of way for shipment over its road to St. Ignace, whence plaintiffs intended to have them towed to Cheboygan for manufacture into shingles at their shingle mill at that place, as defendant understood. The declaration alleged, and the evidence tended to prove, that, in consequence of the burning of said logs, “ plaintiffs ran out of stock for their said shingle…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Allis v. McLeanMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
- Leonard v. BeaudryMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Dolph v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1907
- Industrial Works v. MitchellMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- John Hutchinson Manufacturing Co. v. PinchMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. GalvinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
- Mississippi Power Co. v. HarrisonMississippi Supreme Court · 1963
- Rich v. Daily Creamery Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1942
- Ludwigsen v. LarsenMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
- Truman v. J. I. Case Threshing Machine Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.