John Hutchinson Manufacturing Co. v. Pinch
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Eaton. (Hooker, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMorse, C. J.
The plaintiff sued defendant for machinery and repairs furnished for the latter’s flouring-mill. The defendant claimed that under the agreement, the plaintiff promised to put in the machinery and complete the repairs in a good and workman-like manner within 10 days after the work was commenced, which work should begin “ in a few days or a short time ” after the date of the agreement; that plaintiff did not commence the work as soon as agreed, did not do it in a. workman-like- manner, and did not complete it within four weeks after the work was begun; that by reason of' improper material, and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Griffin v. . ColverNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Howard v. Stillwell & Bierce Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Abbott v. GatchCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1859
- Allis v. McLeanMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
- Benton v. J. A. Fay & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1872
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Burruss v. HinesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1897
- Mississippi Power Co. v. HarrisonMississippi Supreme Court · 1963
- Mazzotta v. BornsteinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- Fell v. NewberryMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Stevens v. YaleMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.