Legal Opinion
Harrington v. Lauer
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided June 8, 1995No. Civ. 93-3166 (CSF)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CLARKSON S. FISHER, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Robert Harrington, previously held the position of Superintendent of Schools pursuant to a contract of employment with defendant Clinton Township Board of Education (“the Board”). The initial contract was entered into on June 1, 1990, and was due to expire on May 31,1993. The parties entered into another contract on April 8, 1993, whereby they agreed to an additional term of employment from June 1, 1993 until July 1, 1996.
In the meantime, a school board election was held on April 19, 1993, which resulted in the replacement of three of the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Schanzer v. Rutgers UniversityDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
- Poteat v. Harrisburg School DistrictDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
- Pruett v. DumasDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1996
- City of Annapolis v. RoweCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Puchalski v. School District of SpringfieldDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001