Legal Opinion

Puchalski v. School District of Springfield

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 30, 2001No. CIV. A. 99-1068PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

WALDMAN, District Judge.

I. Introduction

This case involves the decision of the principal of Springfield High School (“Springfield”) not to renew the contract of David Puchalski as Springfield’s head football coach. Plaintiff David Puchalski asserts parallel claims for age discrimination under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”) and the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act (“PHRA”), a claim for deprivation of a property interest in his job under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and state tort claims for intentional and negligent misrepresentation, civil conspiracy, intentional interference…

2Cases cited80 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Mzamane v. WinfreyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Stone v. Irasburg, Town ofSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
  3. Hogar Club Paraiso, Inc. v. Varela LlavonaDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2002
  4. American Osteopathic Association v. American Board of Internal MedicineDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
  5. BENNETT, M.D. v. CITY OF NEWARKDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API