Legal Opinion
Schanzer v. Rutgers University
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided July 16, 1996No. 94-5059 (JBS)PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SIMANDLE, District Judge:
Plaintiff, Judith Schanzer, brings this action pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2, against Rutgers University (hereinafter “Rutgers”) and numerous of its employees, including President Francis Lawrence, Provost Walter Gordon, Dean Robert Catlin, and Professor Joseph Walker, alleging that she was unlawfully discriminated against on the basis of her race, sex, and religion- while an Assistant Professor in the Department of Theater Arts and Speech at the Camden campus of Rutgers, and in decisions to deny her…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brown v. General Services AdministrationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Baldwin County Welcome Center v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Santiago v. City of VinelandDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
- Calkins v. Dollarland, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
- Acevedo v. Monsignor Donovan High SchoolDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2006
- Gretzula v. Camden County Technical Schools Board of EducationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2013
- Hansel v. SheridanDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1998
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.