Hatcher v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
DUFFY, Justice:
Defendant appeals from convictions for possession with intent to deliver a Narcotic Schedule I Controlled Substance (heroin), 16 Del.C. § 4751, and for maintaining a dwelling for delivering such substances, 16 Del.C. § 4755(a)(5). He argues that the State did not produce sufficient evidence to prove that he had possession of the drugs and that an out-of-court statement of a witness introduced by the prosecution under 11 Del.C. § 3507 (formerly, § 3509) was involuntarily made.
I
We consider the latter contention first because if the statement was properly admitted, it is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Lego v. TwomeySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Keys v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1975
- Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1974
- Dickerson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Hoskins v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2014
- Starling v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2015
- Turner v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2010
- State v. RooksSupreme Court of Delaware · 1979
- Burns v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2013
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.