Legal Opinion
State v. Indrisano
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 22, 1992No. 10659PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNorcott, J.
This case involves an attempt by the defendant to effect a peaceful, self-help recovery of a copy machine, which resulted in his being convicted of disorderly conduct and fined $250.
In this appeal from the judgment of conviction for violating General Statutes § 53a-182,1 the defendant claims that (1) the statute is unconstitutionally vague on its face and as applied to this case, (2) the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support his conviction, (3) the trial court improperly rejected his claim of permissible use of force in defense of stolen property, and (4) the court…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- State v. TatumSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- State v. KingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- State v. AlvarezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. IndrisanoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- State v. JohnsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Clark v. Auto Recovery Bureau Conn., Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1994
- Aviles v. Wayside Auto Body, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2014
- State v. BarlowConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.