Legal Opinion
Hoffman v. Van Duzee
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 12, 1937No. Civ. S. C. 22PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHINN, J., pro tem.
Plaintiffs had judgment in an action to quiet title to a city lot and defendants appeal.
According to a map of the Hubbs tract recorded in 1906, there was a block of seven lots facing on Anaheim Street in the city of Long Beach between Alamitos Avenue on the west and Orange Avenue on the east, having a total frontage of 428.95 feet. The lots were numbered consecutively from one on the west to seven on the east; each had a frontage on Anaheim of 60 feet, with the exception of lot one, which was shown on the map to have a width of 63.95 feet, and lot seven, which was shown to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cragin v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Kneeland v. KorterWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- O'Farrel v. HarneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
- Churchill Co. v. BealCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
3Cited by7 opinions
- Calvi v. BittnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Balestrieri v. SullivanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Alston v. ClintonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
- Harvey Aluminum Inc. v. De ChabertDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1967
- Ramirez v. MookiniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.