Legal Opinion

O'Farrel v. Harney

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1875No. 4487PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from the District Court, Sixth Judicial District, County of Sacramento. Ejectment to recover a belt of land fronting on Ann street, in -the town of Washington, three and a half feet wide, and extending back to the rear line of the lots fronting on said street. The defendant had judgment and the plaintiff appealed. ■ The other facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court:

The town of Washington was laid off and surveyed into lots, blocks and streets in the year 1850; an initial-point was established, stakes were set at the corners of the blocks, and a map was made, which was intended to represent the survey. The initial-point was subsequently lost, and in 1853 two iron bars were set at the northeast and southeast corners of block No. 3, in the place of the stakes which had *127been set when the survey was made, and the bars still remain. In 1864 the county surveyor made a map of the town, which was a traced copy of the first map, and on it were…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Carlyle v. SloanOregon Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Arnold v. HansonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  3. Whiting v. GardnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Smith v. BooneTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Penry v. RichardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API