Legal Opinion

State v. Ballard

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 2000No. NonePublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKonenkamp, Justice

[¶ 1.] If, after issuing a traffic warning, an officer tells a driver she is free to leave but asks for her consent to search her vehicle for drugs, and she refuses, may the officer then detain the driver to await the use of a drug dog? The defendant argues that the officer had insufficient legal grounds to continue detaining her after she was told she was free to go. The circuit court denied her motion to suppress, but we conclude that it should have been granted and reverse.

A

[¶ 2.] On August 14, 1999, at 11:50 p.m., Lawrence County Deputy Sheriff Michael Shafer observed a car driving partly…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. United States v. Gregory B. Bloomfield, Also Known as Earl Marcum JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. State v. AkubaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. KenyonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. LockstedtSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. BowersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  5. State v. DeLaRosaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API