Legal Opinion

Gould v. Steyer

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1881No. 8037PublishedCited by 21 opinions

From the Franklin Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Bicknell, C.

This was an action by one of several legatees and her husband against the others and their husbands, to recover a legacy.

The following are the facts stated in the complaint:

Solomon Kistler, whose will was entered for probate in Hamilton county, Ohio, gave thereby all his estate, real and personal, to his widow for life ; the will directed that, after the widow’s death, five hundred dollars should be paid to the «aid Abilene Gould, and that the residue of the estate should Re given in certain proportions to the said Phœbe Steyer, James Arnold and Emily Baldridge, now the wife of…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ætna Insurance v. BakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Highnote v. WhiteIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Crist v. CristIndiana Supreme Court · 1850
  4. Heady v. State, ex rel. HeadyIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Sugar Creek Township v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1863

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Hochstedler v. HochstedlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Holland v. HollandIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Davidson v. CoonIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Kelley v. AdamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. McAfee v. BendingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API