Highnote v. White
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Jackson Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBiddle, J.
Complaint by the appellee, against the appellant, to recover the possession of four promissory notes.
A demurrer, allegingthe want of facts as a cause, was overruled to the complaint. Answer: 1. General denial; 2. Property in the defendant. Trial hy the court, and finding for the appellee. Judgment and appeal.
The sufficiency of the complaint to constitute a cause of action, and the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the finding, are the questions presented by the record for our decision.
The property replevied is described in the complaint as follows :
“One promissory note for one hundred…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Rapp v. MatthiasIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
- Crist v. CristIndiana Supreme Court · 1850
- Branch v. HolcraftIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
3Cited by12 opinions
- McFadden v. RossIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Hochstedler v. HochstedlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Holland v. HollandIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Gould v. SteyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Fickle v. SneppIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.