Legal Opinion

Holland v. Holland

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1892No. 15,162PublishedCited by 24 opinions

From the Henry Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.

This was an action by the appellant against the appellees to foreclose a mortgage.

The mortgage in suit was executed by the appellees, Welcome R. Holland and Maria Holland, his wife, to one John Holland, who afterwards- assigned the mortgage, and the notes thereby secured, to the appellant.

The complaint alleged that the mortgagors had sold the mortgaged property to one Nathan B. Wade, who, as part of the purchase-money, assumed the payment of the notes secured by the mortgage. Nathan B. Wade and Amanda Wade, his wife, were made parties defendant in the action. At the time the suit was brought…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Curtis v. GoodingIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Berlin v. OglesbeeIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Petry v. AmbrosherIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Laverty v. State ex rel. HillIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Gill v. State ex rel. BoardIndiana Supreme Court · 1880

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Dudley v. PiggIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Whitlock v. Public Service Co. of Indiana, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Supreme Tent v. VolkertIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900
  4. Finch v. McClellanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921
  5. Harrison National Bank v. CulbertsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1896

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API