Legal Opinion

Binkow v. Binkow

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 2, 1941No. Docket No. 64, Calendar No. 41,611PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoyles, J.

The only question in this case is, whether the circuit court in chancery, after granting plaintiff a decree for separate maintenance for two years without reserving further jurisdiction, and without any showing of changed conditions, can amend the decree after the two years have elapsed to extend its provisions for an additional two years.

In March, 1937, plaintiff filed a petition in the circuit court for Wayne county in chancery against her husband under the provisions of 3 Comp. Laws 1929, § 12794 (Stat. Ann. § 25.211), for separate support and maintenance, and for injunctive and other…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bialy v. BialyMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Mayer v. MayerMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Ritzer v. RitzerMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Sherman v. KentMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Gould v. GouldMichigan Supreme Court · 1924

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Monroe v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Battisti v. BattistiMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. Lewis v. LewisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Monroe v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Sturgis v. SturgisMichigan Supreme Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API