Legal Opinion

Monroe v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1946No. L. A. 19622Published

1Opinion of the Court

28 Cal.2d 427 (1946)

EDWIN RUE MONROE, Petitioner,

v.

SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, et al., Respondents.

L. A. No. 19622.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

June 25, 1946.

Reynolds & Painter and Louis Miller for Petitioner.

J. H. O'Connor, County Counsel, Douglas De Coster, Deputy County Counsel, and Hahn, Ross & Goldstone for Respondents.

TRAYNOR, J.

A decree of separate maintenance ordered petitioner to pay his wife, for 27 months, $250 per month for her support and $50 per month for the support of their child. The decree provided that at the end of that period the payments for the support…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Puckett v. PuckettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Erkenbrach v. . ErkenbrachNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  3. Perkins v. Sunset Tel. and Tel. Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
  4. McClure v. McClureCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  5. DeYoung v. DeYoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API