Legal Opinion
Mayer v. Mayer
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided October 5, 1908No. Docket No. 92PublishedCited by 33 opinions
Appeal from Wayne; Brooke, J. Bill by Sarah Mayer against Ignatz Mayer to enforce the terms of a decree for divorce. From a decree for complainant, and an order adjudging defendant guilty of contempt for noncompliance with said decree, defendant appeals. Decree modified, and contempt order set aside.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
Complainant and defendant were formerly husband and wife. On the 20th of April, 1896, the district court of the first district of Oklahoma passed a decree dissolving the marriage between the parties, and awarding the custody of five minor children of the parties to the defendant upon the following terms and conditions :
“The said children are to be sent to the public schools during the school year, and said children are not to be sent out to work unless by permission of the court or judge. The plaintiff is to have the right to visit the said children at their home between the hours of 9 a. m.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Erkenbrach v. . ErkenbrachNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Lynde v. . LyndeNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Livingston v. . LivingstonNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Dow v. BlakeIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
- Page v. PageMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- German v. GermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- Ruge v. RugeWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- Smith v. RogersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Wood v. WoodSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- Ostrander v. OstranderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.