Legal Opinion
Wolff Shoe Co. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided August 24, 1994No. Court No. 92-08-00557. Slip Op. 94-133PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
TSOUCALAS, Judge:
Plaintiff, Wolff Shoe Co. (“Wolff’), brought this action to contest countervailing duties and the underlying payment of interest assessed by the United States Customs Service (“Customs”) on non-rubber footwear import ed by Wolff from Spain. Defendant has petitioned the Court to dismiss the case pursuant to Rule 12(b) of the Rules of this Court, contending this Court lacks jurisdiction because plaintiff filed its summons more than 180 days after its protests were denied and therefore failed to comply with 28 U.S.C. § 2636(a) (1988).
Wolff filed five protests…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Computime, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Audiovox Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Pistorino & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1978
- Transflock, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1991
- Dumas (Juan B.) v. Office of Personnel ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- AutoAlliance International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2002
- Wolff Shoe Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996
- Erwin Hymer Group North America Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017