Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Day

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1891PublishedCited by 10 opinions

PPEAL from district court, Sargent county; Hon. W. Lauder, Judge. S. Action xo set aside certain'mortgage foreclosure proceedings. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Bartholomew, J.

This was an action in equity to set aside and cancel certain foreclosure proceedings by advertisement. There was a decree for plaintiff, and defendants appeal. This action was evidently brought on the theory that the sale was absolutely void. Plaintiff does not ask an extension of the time for redemption, and does ■ not tender the amount he admits to be ^ue. He claims that the sale, and the proceedings thereunder, constituted a cloud upon his title, which he asks a court of equity to remove without conditions. There is nowhere in the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cunningham v. . CassidyNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  2. Jackson ex dem. Hooker v. YoungNew York Supreme Court · 1826
  3. Osman v. TraphagenMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  4. City of San Francisco v. PixleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
  5. Kennedy v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1883

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Grove v. Great Northern Loan Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
  2. McCardia v. BillingsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Whitehead v. Wilson Knitting MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  4. Turk v. BensonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Emmons County v. Lands of First National BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1900

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API