Legal Opinion

Huyck v. Graham

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1890PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to Van Burén. (Buck, J.) Summary proceedings to recover possession of lands_ Complainant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

April 28, 1884, defendant executed to William Anderson a mortgage for $5,646, due in five years, with annual interest at 7 per cent. Anderson died in 1886. Plaintiff was appointed administrator, and commenced a foreclosure of the mortgage by advertisement April 12, 1887, claiming as then due $929.38. In fact, the amount then due was only $525.78. April 28, 1887, another installment of interest became due, amounting to $395.22. The only irregularity in the notice was the •erroneous amount claimed. July 14, 1887, the premises were sold under the notice for the sum of $6,669.48, and were bid in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Goodenow v. CurtisMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Jencks v. AlexanderNew York Court of Chancery · 1845
  3. Grover v. FoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Fosdick v. HusanMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  5. Millard v. TruaxMichigan Supreme Court · 1883

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Peterson v. JohnsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Hawes v. Detroit Fire & Marine InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Western Land & Cattle Co. v. National BankArizona Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Leach v. DoleseMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Drayton v. ChandlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1892

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API