Hayne v. Fisher

Complaint by the appellee, against the appellant, in two paragraphs. The first paragraph was dismissed, and no question arises upon it here. The second was as follows :

*159“For a second and further cause of action, the plaintiff says, that on the-day of July, 1876, the plaintiff was the holder of a promissory note on James W. Flanagau, dated January 1st, 1875, calling for fifteen hundred dollars and ten per cent, interest after maturity, and reasonable attorney’s fees if suit be instituted thereon, which note was payable twenty-four months after date, and was given for the last instalment of…