Legal Opinion

Bernitz v. Stratford

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1864PublishedCited by 11 opinions

APPEAL from the Tipton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

John McCoy made his note to Frederick Bernitz, and the latter assigned the note to Isaac W. Stratford before it fell due. Stratford did not sue McCoy, the maker, to recover the amount of the note from him, but sued Bernitz on his assignment, alleging, as an excuse for failing to sue McCoy, the maker, that he had left the State.

Bernitz answered in bar of the action against him, in addition to the general denial, that McCoy left property in the State sufficient to pay the note, which property could be reached by attachment. Issue of fact by denial.

On the trial the note, amounting, with interest…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cheek v. MortonIndiana Supreme Court · 1850
  2. Dole v. WatsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1850
  3. State ex rel. McCullough v. DrulyIndiana Supreme Court · 1852

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Holton v. McCormickIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Smythe v. ScottIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Schmied v. FrankIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Daily v. RobinsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Hayne v. FisherIndiana Supreme Court · 1879

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API