Legal Opinion

Dole v. Watson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 1850PublishedCited by 5 opinions

ERROR to the Vigo Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBlackford, J.

This was an action, of assumpsit in which Watson was plaintiff and Dole défendant. The declaration contains four counts. The first three counts are on the indorsement of a promissory note. The fourth count requires no further notice, as it gives rise to no question in the cause.

The first count alleges that a note was given, on the 7th of November, 1835, by one John C. Hurd to the defendant, Dole, for the payment of 1,500 dollars in one year from the 1st of January then next; which note was, on the 23d of July, 1836, assigned by the payee to the plaintiff, and was also, on the 25th of October,…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hardesty v. KinworthyIndiana Supreme Court · 1846

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bernitz v. StratfordIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Voorhies v. AtleeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
  3. Hayne v. FisherIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Litterer v. PageIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  5. Somerby v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API