Legal Opinion

Howard v. Rose Twp., Payne Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 4, 1913No. 2563PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error from District Court, Payne County; A. H. Huston, Judge. Actiou by Welcome Howard against Eose Township, Payne County, and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

BREWER, C.

Tbis snit was commenced on the 7th day of June, 1909, by Welcome Howard, as plaintiff, against Rose township, in Payne county, and G. Brewer, J. K. P. Schooler, and Peter Wills, the officers of said township, as defendants, to recover damages in the sum of $1,250 to certain lands and crops growing thereon, because of an alleged breach of duty upon the part of said defendants.

The facts out of which this controversy arose appear to be, in brief, that some time in 1905 Rose township, for the .purpose of deviating a public highway from the section line upon which Howard's land…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Barnes v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Jansen v. City of AtchisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
  3. Higert v. City of GreencastleIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Hutson v. . the Mayor, C., of New-YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
  5. Chas. T. Derr Construction Co. v. GelruthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hazlett v. Board of Com'rs of Muskogee CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  2. Mott v. HullSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Strong v. DaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Welker v. Annett Bd. of Com'rs Pawnee Cty.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  5. Farmers' Product & Supply Co. v. BondSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API