Strong v. Day
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Custer County; T. A. Edwards, Judge. Action by S. J. Strong against G. W. Day and others. Prom a judgment sustaining a general demurrer to the petition, plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
BURFORD, C.
Plaintiff alleged that the individual defendants constituted the board of county commissioners of Ouster county; that, as such, they were charged by law with the duty of repairing the public bridges in the county over 20 feet in length; that among such bridges was one constnxeted over Deer creek at a point particularly described, said bridge having been built by the county in 1910; that said bridge was upon an improved public road upon a section line laid out and improved by the county; that said bridge was being used as a county bridge on June 2, 1915; that on said day,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Supervisors v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Robinson v. . ChamberlainNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
- County Commissioners v. DuckettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1864
- Hover v. BarkhoofCommission of Appeals · 1870
- Amy v. The SupervisorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Consolidated School District No. 1 v. WrightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Brown v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1934
- Lowe v. StorozyszynSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Roxana Petroleum Co. v. GoldrickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Haskell Lemon Construction Co. v. Independent School District Number 12 of EdmondSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.