Commonwealth v. Felgoise
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Baldrige, J.,
The appellant in this case was convicted of perform ing a criminal operation on Edna Mendys, an unmarried girl, 19 years of age.
The appellant’s first contention in this appeal is that the Commonwealth failed to prove by competent evidence the corpus delicti.
Dr. Wadsworth, the coroner’s physician, who made a post mortem examination on the body of Edna Mendys on February 18, 1935, the day after her death, testified for the Commonwealth that the deceased had been pregnant and that her uterus had been emptied; that the opening of the uterus appeared to be of the type…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Commonwealth v. GardnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Cooper v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Commonwealth v. PugliseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Commonwealth v. BrickerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Commonwealth v. ColacinoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
3Cited by4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. RandallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Commonwealth v. DolphSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Commonwealth v. OldhamSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Commonwealth v. FisherSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964