Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Fisher

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 17, 1964No. Appeal, No. 76PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Flood, J.,

The defendant has appealed Ms conviction of abortion upon the ground that there was no evidence that any improper drug was administered and Doctor Sex-Ion, the Commonwealth’s medical witness, testified that he could not tell, on the basis of the physical examination of the victim, taken alone, that there had been an induced abortion.

The lay witnesses did not see what drug the defendant used upon the victim or how it was used. Indeed they did not see or know whether he used any drug upon her. Their testimony is, however, ample, if believed by the jury, to warrant the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. FelgoiseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. BakerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API