Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Randall
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided June 11, 1957No. Appeals, Nos. 71, 72 and 73PublishedCited by 73 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Ervin, J.,
Defendant, Robert Randall, was found guilty under the Act of June 3, 1953, P. L. 277, §1, 18 PS §4532, which provides: “Whoever, being- of the age of twenty-one years and upwards, by any act corrupts or tends to corrupt the morals of any child under the age of eighteen years ... is guilty of a misdemeanor. . . .” Defendants, Robert Randall and Sophie Wofsy, were also found guilty of violating Paragraph 1, §493, of the Liquor Code, 47 PS §4-493, which provides: “It shall be unlawful (1) For any licensee or the board, or any employe, servant or agent of such licensee or of…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Winters v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Jordan v. De GeorgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Zorach v. ClausonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Sproles v. BinfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- Commonwealth v. TaylorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- State v. HodgesOregon Supreme Court · 1969
- Tahiti Bar, Inc. Liquor License CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Commonwealth v. MarlinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Bradshaw v. RawlingsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.