Legal Opinion
Danek v. Hommer
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided June 14, 1954PublishedCited by 126 opinions
1Per curiam
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Francis in the court below.
2ConcurrenceHeher, J.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Vanderbilt, and Justices Heher, Oliphant, Wacheneeld, Burling, Jacobs and Brennan — 7.
For reversal — None.
3Cases cited1 opinion
- Parker v. Niagara Fire Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
4Cited by126 opinions
- Voorhees v. Preferred Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- Longobardi v. Chubb Ins. Co. of New JerseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
- Sparks v. St. Paul InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- Flomerfelt v. CardielloSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Aetna Life & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
121 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.