Legal Opinion
McCollum v. Superior Court
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided December 8, 1978No. 2 CA-CIV 3129PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HATHAWAY, Judge.
Petitioner, a prisoner in the lawful custody of the State of California, was delivered to the Pima County Jail under the authority of the Uniform Act to Secure the Attendance of Witnesses from Without a State in Criminal Proceedings (A.R.S.Secs. 13-4091-4096), and is presently confined there. The purpose for which he was brought into this jurisdiction, namely to testify in Pima County Cause No. A-34456, no longer exists because the matter has been resolved. However, petitioner was not returned to California because of a subpoena issued in Pima County Cause No. A-25954,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hunt Foods and Industries, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
- Wright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1972
- DuPont v. BronstonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- Ingalls v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. JoosMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
- First National Bank & Trust Co. of Ada v. ArlesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- First National Bank & Trust Co. of Ada v. ArlesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991