Legal Opinion
State v. Joos
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided September 1, 1987No. 14683PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOGAN, Judge.
A jury has found defendant Robert N. Joos guilty of simulating legal process, as defined and denounced by § 575.130.1(2), RSMo 1978. His punishment has been assessed at confinement in the county jail for six (6) months; he has also been ordered to pay a fine of $400. He appeals.
The defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the judgment of conviction. In assessing the sufficiency of the evidence, we must accept as true all evidence and inferences that tend to support the verdict and disregard all evidence and inferences to the contrary. The question is…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Castaneda v. PartidaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. SullivanWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. SullivanWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
- State v. DavisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
- State v. DuffeyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.