Legal Opinion

Ingalls v. Superior Court

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 4, 1977No. 2 CA-CIV 2700PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HATHAWAY, Judge.

Petitioners have brought this special action to challenge the trial court’s granting of a protective order. Since such discovery matters are properly entertained in special actions, City of Phoenix v. Peterson, 11 Ariz.App. 136, 462 P.2d 829 (1969), and since we believe the respondent court abused its discretion in granting the order, we accept jurisdiction and grant relief.

On July 5, 1977, the petitioners filed a complaint alleging that the real parties in interest had committed fraud in the sale of realty to them. The primary claim focused upon statements that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Phoenix v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  2. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. VelizCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Miller v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  2. McCollum v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  3. BNSF Railway Co. v. ButtrickCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  4. FRED MILLER M.D., Et Ux. v. LUZ BARRERA, MUTUAL INSURANCE COCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API