Legal Opinion
First National Bank & Trust Co. of Ada v. Arles
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 30, 1991No. 67477Published
1Concurrence
SUMMERS, Justice:
May judicial proceedings in the district court be used to force a judgment debtor to pay money to the plaintiff creditor where the defendant debtor’s sole source of income is social security and disability benefits? The question has not been presented before to this Court. Upon review of the applicable federal statute and cases from other jurisdictions we answer in the negative.
The First National Bank of Ada agreed to loan Arles money for an automobile. When Arles failed to make the payments required by the terms of the loan the Bank *539obtained judgment against him. Arles…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Philpott v. Essex County Welfare BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Bennett v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Horizons, Inc. v. Keo Leasing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Amarex, Inc. v. BakerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
- Robert Tidwell v. Richard Schweiker, Etc., and Ivan Pavkovic, Etc., Robert Schreckenberg v. Richard S. Schweiker, Etc., and Ivan Pavkovic, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.