Lorenz v. Hart-Parr Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of tbe circuit court for Sheboy-gan county: Michael KiewaN, Circuit Judge. This is an action brought by the plaintiff to recover the amount paid for a gasoline traction engine purchased from tbe defendant under a written contract containing the following warranty : “It is warranted that it is well made and of good materials and workmanship. “That if properly operated it-will develop the nominal rated capacity of power continuously and easily.
Read the full summary
Appeal from a judgment of tbe circuit court for Sheboy-gan county: Michael KiewaN, Circuit Judge. This is an action brought by the plaintiff to recover the amount paid for a gasoline traction engine purchased from tbe defendant under a written contract containing the following warranty : “It is warranted that it is well made and of good materials and workmanship. “That if properly operated it-will develop the nominal rated capacity of power continuously and easily. “That it will successfully operate a threshing outfit of a size and capacity usually operated successfully by an oi’di-nary steam…
1Opinion of the CourtBabNes, J.
The appellant insists that the evidence does not support the first, second, third, and fourth findings of the jury, and that the court should have changed the answers of the jury in each instance, and that if the court did not see fit to do so it should have granted a new trial. We think there was ample evidence in the record to sustain the answers of the jury to the first, second, and third questions of the verdict. In fact the. preponderance of the evidence supports these findings. Whatever difficulty the case presents arises *264out of tbe contention that the answer to the fourth question has…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Nichols & Shepard Co. v. WiedemannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Gridley v. MyersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Kingman & Co. v. WatsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
- Peterson v. Walter A. Wood Mowing & Reaping Machine Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1896
- Hein v. MildebrandtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jones v. BrandtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
- Ross v. HanerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Fairbanks v. . Supply Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- Fairbanks, Morse & Co. v. Twin City Supply Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- Murray Co. v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1922