Peterson v. Walter A. Wood Mowing & Reaping Machine Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Lyon District Court. — Hon.- Scott M. Ladd, Judge. Action to recover the price paid for a harvester. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtKjnne, J.
1 2 I. Plaintiff ordered a reaping machine of.the defendant, which he agreed to purchase subject to the following printed warranty: “All our machines are warranted to be well made and of good material, and to do good work, with proper management, when set up and operated as per printed directions. If, upon starting any of our machines, it should not work well, immediate written notice must be given to the Walter A. Wood Mowing and Reaping Machine Co., at Minneapolis, Minnesota, or the local agent from whom it was purchased, and reasonable time allowed to get to it and remedy the defects, if…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- D. M. Osborne & Co. v. BackerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
3Cited by16 opinions
- First National Bank v. DutcherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- Robinson & Co. v. BerkeySupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
- Ruthven Bros. v. American Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
- Herkimer v. KeelerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
- Producers Livestock Marketing Ass'n v. John Morrell & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1935
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.