Legal Opinion
Hasek v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided February 22, 2001No. 1 — 99—4079PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice South
Terry Hasek, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, brought this class action against DaimlerChrysler Corporation (Chrysler). In their original complaint, plaintiffs alleged that Chrysler’s model years 1991-95 Jeep vehicles with 4.0 liter (4.0L) and 2.5-liter (2.5L) engines were defective due to an idle knocking noise in the engine. The original complaint contained four counts: count I was based on the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act (815 ILCS 505/1 et seq. (West 1998)); count II was based upon common law fraud; count III was based upon…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wheeler v. Sunbelt Tool Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1989
- Illinois Valley Asphalt, Inc. v. La Salle National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
- McGrady v. Chrysler Motors Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1977
- Herst v. CharkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
- Collum v. Fred Tuch BuickAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Samuel-Bassett v. Kia Motors America, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Reid v. Unilever United States, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
- Ibarrola v. Kind, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
- Voelker v. Porsche Cars North America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Evitts v. DaimlerChrysler Motors Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.