Legal Opinion

Evitts v. DaimlerChrysler Motors Corp.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 11, 2005No. 1-04-2118PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Greiman

Plaintiffs Joseph and Patricia Evitts appeal from the circuit court’s dismissal of their second amended complaint for breach of warranty and violation of consumer protection statutes. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

Plaintiffs purchased a 1999 Chrysler Sebring convertible in May 1999 from a Chrysler dealership in Elmhurst. Included in the purchase price was a 3-year/36,000-mile warranty. Plaintiffs also purchased an extended, 6-year/75,000-mile warranty, issued by defendant Chrysler Service Contracts, Inc. (CSC). The model that plaintiffs purchased had been manufactured with an…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Connick v. Suzuki Motor Co., Ltd.Illinois Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Miller v. William Chevrolet/GEO, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  3. Weatherman v. Gary-Wheaton Bank of Fox Valley, N.A.Illinois Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Lipinski v. Martin J. Kelly Oldsmobile, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  5. Walsh v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. In re Rust-Oleum Restore Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
  2. People Ex Rel. Madigan v. Petco Petroleum Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  3. TruServ Corp. v. Ernst & Young LLPAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  4. Dod Technologies v. Mesirow Ins. ServicesAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  5. Emrikson v. MorfinAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API