Collum v. Fred Tuch Buick
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Schwartz
This action is brought by plaintiff to recover the price of a new automobile which he had purchased from the defendant, Fred Tuch Buick, agent for the manufacturer. The cause was tried by the court without a jury, and at the close of plaintiffs case, pursuant to defendant’s motion, the court entered judgment for defendants. Plaintiff appeals, contending that:(1) he was given an implied warranty by the dealer that the car was fit for use;(2) the car was not fit for use, and he properly revoked the purchase, returned the automobile to defendant and brought this action against the dealer for the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Tiger Motor Co. v. McMurtrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
- Haas v. Buick Motor Division of General Motors Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1959
- Bilyeu v. PlantAppellate Court of Illinois · 1966
- Appleman v. Fabert Motors, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1961
3Cited by26 opinions
- Durfee v. Rod Baxter Imports, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Paul Priebe v. Autobarn, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Collins Radio Co. of Dallas v. BellCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1981
- Hasek v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2001
- Belfour v. Schaumberg AutoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.