Legal Opinion

Collum v. Fred Tuch Buick

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 20, 1972No. 55466PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Schwartz

This action is brought by plaintiff to recover the price of a new automobile which he had purchased from the defendant, Fred Tuch Buick, agent for the manufacturer. The cause was tried by the court without a jury, and at the close of plaintiffs case, pursuant to defendant’s motion, the court entered judgment for defendants. Plaintiff appeals, contending that:(1) he was given an implied warranty by the dealer that the car was fit for use;(2) the car was not fit for use, and he properly revoked the purchase, returned the automobile to defendant and brought this action against the dealer for the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tiger Motor Co. v. McMurtrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
  2. Haas v. Buick Motor Division of General Motors Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1959
  3. Bilyeu v. PlantAppellate Court of Illinois · 1966
  4. Appleman v. Fabert Motors, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1961

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Durfee v. Rod Baxter Imports, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Paul Priebe v. Autobarn, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  3. Collins Radio Co. of Dallas v. BellCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1981
  4. Hasek v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  5. Belfour v. Schaumberg AutoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API