Mill v. State
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CONNOR, Justice.
Appellant seeks to have his conviction for assault with a dangerous weapon reversed. He contends (1) that the crime of assault with a dangerous weapon should be redefined as a crime requiring specific intent; (2) that a defense of diminished capacity should be applicable to crimes requiring only general criminal intent; (3) that the prosecutor made an improper final argument which the trial court refused to mitigate by a curative instruction; and (4) that his sentence should be reduced.
Appellant Mill started a small logging business in Palmer in 1970. In 1973 he hired…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Ladner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- State v. ChaneyAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
- Love v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1969
- People v. ConleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Hensel v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Hart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1985
- Abruska v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1985
- Johnson v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
- Loesche v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.