Legal Opinion

Mill v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1978No. 2692PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CONNOR, Justice.

Appellant seeks to have his conviction for assault with a dangerous weapon reversed. He contends (1) that the crime of assault with a dangerous weapon should be redefined as a crime requiring specific intent; (2) that a defense of diminished capacity should be applicable to crimes requiring only general criminal intent; (3) that the prosecutor made an improper final argument which the trial court refused to mitigate by a curative instruction; and (4) that his sentence should be reduced.

Appellant Mill started a small logging business in Palmer in 1970. In 1973 he hired…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Ladner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. State v. ChaneyAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Love v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1969
  5. People v. ConleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Hensel v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Hart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1985
  3. Abruska v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1985
  4. Johnson v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Loesche v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API