Legal Opinion
In Re Ralph Lauren Womenswear, Inc.
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 21, 1997No. 18-23497PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION ON MOTION TO ENFORCE CHARGING LIEN
TINA L. BROZMAN, Chief Judge.
Stroock & Stroock & Lavan (“Stroock”) asks me to declare and enforce a $510,000 attorneys’ charging lien on the settlement proceeds of Stuart L. Kreisler’s claim against this estate. Kreisler does not dispute the validity of Stroock’s lien, the overall quality of Stroock’s work, or the $2 million settlement Strooek obtained on his behalf. Rather, Kreisler contends that Stroock did not manage or supervise its staff and experts efficiently and is therefore not entitled to full payment. At the end of the representation,…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Local Loan Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- In Re Pacor, Inc. v. John Higgins, Jr. And Louise HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Celotex Corp. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Peacock v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- In re Accounting of Lincoln Rochester Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1974
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- White Diamond Co., Ltd. v. Castco, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Geron v. Schulman (In Re Manshul Construction Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Liddle & Robinson, L.L.P. v. Daley (In Re Daley)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Seiller & Handmaker v. Smith (In re Commonwealth Institutional Securities)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2006
- In Re Estate LaRosaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.