Legal Opinion
Liddle & Robinson, L.L.P. v. Daley (In Re Daley)
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 8, 1998No. 14-10251PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION ON MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
TINA L. BROZMAN, Chief Judge.
Two creditors of the debtor, both law firms in which a fellow named Paul Shoemaker was or is a partner, are sparring in this adversary proceeding over the payment of one by William Daley, the debtor, to the detriment of the other. Liddle & Robinson (“L & R”), Shoemaker’s former firm, charges that Shoemaker and his current law firm, Greenfield, Stein & Senior, L.L.P. (“GSS”), took money from Daley which he had promised to them. Shoemaker & GSS, on the grounds of lack of subject matter…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- In Re Pacor, Inc. v. John Higgins, Jr. And Louise HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Mortensen v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Celotex Corp. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Luis E. Garcia, M.D. v. Copenhaver, Bell & Associates, m.d.'s, P.A., Defendant-Third Party St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Desert Empire Bank, Etc. v. Insurance Co. Of North America, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Trust v. C.I.B.C. Oppenheimer Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1999
- Kraken Investments Ltd. v. Jacobs (In re Salander-O'reilly Galleries, LLC)District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- In Re Sw Bach & Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- In Re BergUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2007
- Wrt Creditors Liquidation v. Cibc OppenheimerDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.