Legal Opinion

City of Alameda v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 4, 1974No. Civ. 35267PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SIMS, Acting P. J.

An alternative writ of mandate was granted pursuant to the provisions of section 400 of the Code of Civil Procedure to review the action of the trial court in denying petitioner’s motion for a change of venue which was predicated upon the provisions of section 394 of that code. In support of the order it is contended that the provisions of the section leave the question of the proper place of trial to the discretion of the trial court when an action between two cities in the same county is involved. It is concluded that the provisions of the section require a change…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Moore v. McKevittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Crocker v. ConreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. City of Los Angeles v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. Finance & Construction Co. v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Garrett v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. San Francisco Foundation v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  3. County of San Bernardino v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  4. Central Contra Costa Sanitary District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. Arntz Builders v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API