Finance & Construction Co. v. City of Sacramento
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
This action against the defendant, the City of Sacramento, was filed in the county of Yolo. Said defendant appeared therein and moved the court for a change of the place of trial of said action upon the ground that the plaintiff was either a resident of or was doing business in said county of Yolo. The motion was granted and an order made changing the place of trial of said action from said county of Yolo to the county of Napa. From this order plaintiff has appealed. The order was granted under the authority of section 394 of the Code of Civil Procedure and was based upon the following state…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gen. Conference of Free Baptists v. BerkeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- George R. Barse Live Stock Co. v. Range Valley Cattle Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1897
- City of Stockton v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
3Cited by17 opinions
- Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- McClearen v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- City of Los Angeles v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Court of Appeal · 1958
- Garrett v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- San Francisco Foundation v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.