Legal Opinion

State v. Cameron

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 28, 1999No. C7-99-1529PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVIES, Judge.

Appellant alleges that the district court erred by failing to apply his presentence jail credit to each of his consecutive sentences. We affirm.

FACTS

Appellant Michael Eugene Cameron pleaded guilty to two counts of criminal vehicular injury causing great bodily harm and one count of criminal vehicular injury causing substantial bodily harm. The district court sentenced appellant to serve 12 months on count I, 12 months on count II to run concurrently with the count I sentence, and 12 months on count III to run consecutive to the other sentences, for a total incarceration…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. BromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Effinger v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  3. State v. PatricelliSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  4. State v. ParrCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  5. State v. EltingCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. BradleyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
  2. State v. RazmyslowskiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API